Two corrections from building this website
A BusinessOS case description said that “AI independently gathered the data” and connected a newly identified pattern to scientific research. It sounded plausible, but it did not describe the work I meant.
The first correction concerned who did the work: the system, not AI alone. The second concerned the method: we were not citing research. We used the scientific method to treat an insight as a hypothesis, prepare new material and test it in practice. These were not interchangeable phrases. They described different work.
The passage, the distinction, the boundary
Instead of “write this better”, I identify the passage and explain what it needs to mean. Here: “The system is the subject. Describe applying the scientific method, not referring to research. Do not add results we have not provided”.
After the revision, I read the whole passage again. I check not only that the requested words changed, but that the meaning survived and no new, equally plausible error appeared. An annotation is a convenient way to point to the passage. The same work can be done in an ordinary conversation with AI.